I thoroughly enjoyed this video. Of course the fact that they started at MIT in Cambridge was fun as it is a local school.
MIT students are some of the smartest people in the world. They are extremely wired. Some thoughts jumped out at me during this segment.
The students are so wired they will interrupt face to face social interactions to answer a phone call, respond to an e-mail or tweet, or check Facebook. That is actually very sad. Personal interactions are deteriorating for our digital natives. Does anybody just sit and talk anymore?
The students are distracted by technology. Even in class they check e-mail, twitter, etc. when they should be focusing on the lesson. And this is true whether the lesson is lecture or interactive . These students can't stop multi-tasking.
The MIT students claim they are completely capable of multi-tasking and multi-tasking successfully. The study in California, however, shows a very different result than student perceptions. Multi-taskers are bad at all aspects of the tasks they are multi-tasking to do, versus performing the tasks independently.
The segment on Korea was fascinating, It is a country that is wired to the max, but they are attempting to install ethics and good technology habits in students. I don’t see that working in this country. The country's problem of technology and gaming interfering with school such that the country offers two week Internet Rescue Camps was scary. It is an interesting idea, again I don’t see that happening in this country. The student profiled said he expected to resume computer use when he left the class. so does the rescue really work?
The NY IS 339 school turned around due to use of technology. Each student receives a laptop and lessons are done online. School transformation was incredible. But, students now have instant gratification learning. They browse during class (distraction again). They work at defeating firewalls to get to sites the school is blocking on purpose.
One message came through loud and clear: reading and writing skills deteriorate as students get older.
I know I get distracted. At work I constantly check my personal email on my iPad and browse when things are slow. When not working I do several tasks at one time.
The World of Warcraft segment was near and dear to my personal life as I am a long term player. When you play and belong to a guild it is a social environment as well as a gaming environment. The guild can be like family. You are connecting with people from all over the world. But it can be addictive. I know someone who was so addicted to WoW that she became aggressive, confrontational, and abusive to friends and family. She trashed many friendships (mine included) and eventually realized her addiction and stopped playing Wow. But I hear she is on Facebook playing the games there constantly so did she really beat her addiction? I don't think so.
The Second Life segment was sad for me. In real life I know of someone whose wife left him to go live with her Second Life “husband” … and his real life wife. She moved to another state to be with this man she met online even though he was not leaving his wife. She was so addicted she got into serious debt. Unlike WoW Second Life, at least at the time, allowed you to spend real life money for items in game.
Seeing a corporation like IBM using a game for virtual reality for meetings and basically requiring its employees to do so left me feeling uncomfortable. What if you are an addictive personality in games but are required to use it for work? Isn’t that like making an alcoholic have a meeting in a bar? It also reduces the face to face work day environment which provides a level of human contact now greatly reduced at IBM.
Remote control warfare? It makes war even more impersonal. Army Video Game recruiting center – scary, but I suspect enrollment will go up quickly.